The Background: VAT Dispute Between HMRC and Bolt
Bolt, a major ride-hailing platform, operates as a private hire vehicle (PHV) operator in the UK. Since August 2022, it has acted as principal in providing transport services purchasing them from self-employed drivers and reselling them to end customers via its app.
Bolt sought a non-statutory ruling from HMRC regarding whether its ride-hailing services could fall under the scope of TOMS, a simplified VAT scheme traditionally applied to tour operators and travel agents.
HMRC rejected Bolt’s claim. In their view, Bolt’s services were not comparable to those offered by tour operators and therefore fell outside the scope of TOMS. Bolt appealed.
The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) sided with Bolt in December 2023, ruling that its services could fall under TOMS. HMRC subsequently escalated the case to the Upper Tribunal, where the FTT’s ruling was upheld.
What is TOMS and Why Does It Matter?
The Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme is a special VAT regime designed for businesses that:
- Act as principals in supplying travel services
- Buy in components like transport or accommodation from other businesses
- Resell those services to the end customer, often without modifying them
Instead of charging VAT on the total sale price, TOMS applies VAT only to the margin, being the difference between what the customer pays and what the company paid its suppliers.
Key features:
- No input VAT recovery on bought-in services
- VAT due only on the margin
- Single supply treatment, simplifying compliance
-
TOMS was created to deal with the complexity of taxing cross-border travel services but until recently, was largely seen as the domain of traditional tour operators offering packaged holidays. The Bolt case is reshaping that perspective.
Key Legal Question: Is Bolt Providing “Travel Services”?
At the heart of this dispute was a deceptively simple question:
Are Bolt’s ride-hailing services “of a kind commonly provided by tour operators or travel agents”?
HMRC said no. They argued that Bolt’s real-time, on-demand taxi rides lacked the packaging, distance, or structure typical of traditional travel services.
But the Tribunal took a more high-level view. They ruled that:
- Passenger transport is a form of travel service and one that travel agents and tour operators do routinely provide.
- Bolt resells these services without materially altering them, which aligns with the requirements of TOMS.
- The app-based nature or “on-demand” timing of the service does not disqualify it from being a travel service.
This last point is significant: the court rejected HMRC’s argument that only scheduled or pre-booked transport could qualify. The Tribunal reasoned that the ability to choose pick-up times or destinations doesn’t change the fact that the service being sold is passenger transport.
Not Just About Bolt: Why This Ruling Matters
This isn’t a one-off case. It’s a statement about how VAT law can and should evolve alongside technology.
It validates platform-based business models
Bolt doesn’t own cars or employ drivers but it contracts with both drivers and customers as principal. That structure mirrors what many marketplaces and gig economy platforms are doing today. The ruling affirms that such models can still qualify for TOMS, provided they meet the scheme’s criteria.
It broadens TOMS eligibility
This case expands the practical interpretation of TOMS beyond packaged holidays or multi-day itineraries. Transport services, even when provided as single journeys or transfers, may qualify especially when supported by digital platforms offering booking, support, and travel advice.
It reduces VAT burdens
For eligible businesses, TOMS reduces VAT payable to only the profit margin, rather than the full transaction value. This can significantly lower VAT liabilities, a key benefit for high-volume, low-margin providers like ride-hailing apps or digital travel platforms.
HMRC’s Position: Why They Pushed Back
HMRC’s argument was rooted in tradition. They argued that:
- Bolt’s services were not “comparable” to those of traditional tour operators
- The on-demand nature of the service, and the lack of packaging or accommodation, meant it didn’t fit the TOMS profile
- Only a small proportion of Bolt’s rides (e.g. airport transfers or long-distance trips) resembled the offerings of tour operators
The Tribunal rejected these points. It found that distinguishing services based on whether they’re booked 1 hour or 1 day in advance is arbitrary, and that transport whether by train, taxi, or private hire remains fundamentally a travel service.
What the Ruling Clarified for VAT Treatment
1. “Commonly provided by tour operators” is not a rigid definition
The Tribunal favoured a flexible, commercially realistic approach. Passenger transport services, even when delivered through apps or intermediaries, fall within the broad category of travel services.
2. Multiplicity of services is not required
You don’t need to package transport with accommodation, excursions, or insurance. A single, bought-in service like airport transport can still qualify as long as it’s resold as principal and not materially altered.
3. Digital elements add value, not complexity
Bolt’s app-based features journey planning, helpdesk support, and travel-related content were viewed as complementary, not disqualifying. They actually helped reinforce the view that Bolt provided a customer-facing travel experience.
What This Means for Your Business
If your company:
- Acts as principal in reselling travel or transport services
- Buys those services from third-party providers
- Doesn’t materially change or bundle them into non-travel offerings
-
…then this decision supports your potential inclusion under TOMS.
That includes:
- Airport shuttle platforms
- Chauffeur and transfer services
- Corporate travel apps
- Event transport providers
- Digital marketplaces offering group travel coordination
By qualifying for TOMS, these businesses could streamline their VAT reporting and reduce liabilities as long as they meet the structural requirements.
What You Should Do Now
If you suspect your services might qualify for TOMS in light of this decision, here are practical next steps:
- Review your supply chain: Are you acting as principal? Are services bought-in from VAT-registered providers?
- Examine service structure: Are services passed to customers without material change?
- Review VAT treatment history: Have claims been rejected due to outdated interpretations of “tour operator”?
- Engage a VAT reclaim specialist: This ruling strengthens the case for reassessing historical positions but reclaiming under TOMS still requires careful documentation.
Final Word
The Bolt ruling marks a pivotal moment in the evolution of VAT interpretation. It demonstrates that VAT law can adapt to modern business realities and that digital-first transport and travel services deserve equal consideration under schemes like TOMS.
At VAT IT Reclaim, we help businesses navigate these complex transitions, from compliance risks to reclaim opportunities.
Want to know if your transport services qualify for TOMS? Let’s talk.
